I know most regular readers aren't the first ones in line to raise their hands when asked if anyone trusts the New York Times for fair and balanced reporting, but still wow.
...the editorial standards at the Times: an article is “as accurate as it could have been” even if the facts are completely wrong. Even if the original court record was never checked. Even if crucial interviews were translated by partisan activists. Even if those activists then use the resulting article for fundraising efforts. At the Times, none of that matters. None of that’s worthy of a correction, even after the article’s facts have been proven wrong.
Is it any wonder newspaper readership is dropping?
...
:: Bitter 10:13 AM [+] ::
...